As morning commutes go, my trip into town the other day gave me a reason to pause and think.
Heading along Front Street, towards the flagpole, the billowing flag was at half-mast, and flying upside down. I pulled over to snap a quick photo, but the Corporation employee was already tugging at the rope to flip the flag.
You may know that flying a flag at half-mast marks a prominent death in the community. The meaning of an upside down flag may be less familiar. In the maritime world, a flipped flag signifies ‘vessel in distress’ – a request for aid from nearby ships.
In the US, an upside down flag means “dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property”. An inverted ‘Stars and Stripes’ has also become a symbol of political protest: for some, it signifies discontent with the political system, for others, disrespect to the Nation.
As with so much in life, it often comes down to your perspective.
We are an Island struggling with Covid 19, curtailed liberties, political frustration, and, above all, increasing economic hardship. There are people in Bermuda who are experiencing “dire distress”. An upturned flag is a stark and immediate warning. We cannot allow it to become the symbol of our Island’s future.
TURNING THE TABLES
The facts about last month’s Revolve Event are still unfurling in public. Early indicators suggested someone was not being straight. What started with people waving their hands in the air, descended into finger pointing.
The Premier’s initial response was full spin-mode: calling for a police investigation. His tweeted outrage on 9 June suggested he knew nothing of the Revolve event. The following week, the Premier gave the impression that the Revolve ‘raft up’ did not have the Government’s permission stating: “The suggestion that anyone in Government gave or issued approval for something to take place which is not lawful is not correct.”
Yet after the Blu lockdown party – and the recent unmasking of the Premier’s champagne cocktail party – his ‘it wasn’t me’ riff sounded hollow.
Last Friday in Parliament, the Premier was pressed by the Opposition to explain what he knew about the Revolve event and when he knew it. He accepted that – as Minister of Tourism – he was aware of it. Yet he twice refused to answer the question of whenhe became aware. Why admit what he knew, but refuse to answer when he knew it?
If the Premier actually knew what going on before his 9 June tweet, then his message to Bermudians that day is unmasked as misleading – a slippery attempt to put clear blue water between himself and the boat party. More answers are needed I suggest.
CANVASSING CONFLICTS
When canvassing for the October 2020 election, I often received conflicting guidance from voters. At one house, my constituent implored that we politicians must set aside partisan differences and work together. Yet, at the next house, the voter was equally clear: “You got to give the PLP hell.”
Can both of these voters be right?
————————————————————————
Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful, or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites, or repeats previous comments will be removed.
User comments posted on this website are solely the views and opinions of the comment writer and are not a representation of or reflection of the opinions of TNN or its staff.
TNN reserves the right to remove, edit or censor any comments.
TNN accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for the comments made by users.